![]() |
||
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: May 2004
文章: 676
|
他可能是用英文版的windows.
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2001 您的住址: Rivia
文章: 7,039
|
引用:
在中文的論壇打英文... 這個真是奇怪的行為.. ![]()
__________________
Folding@home with GPGPU集中討論串 Unix Review: ArchLinux●Sabayon●OpenSolaris 2008.5●Ubuntu 8.10 AVs Review: GDTC●AntiVir SS●ESS●KIS 09●NIS 09●Norton 360 V3 ![]() I Always Get What I Want. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Oct 2003 您的住址: 美國啦
文章: 167
|
引用:
I don't care which kind of language you are using! At least, your article should be grammatically correct. If you cannot do this, USE THE LANGUAGE THAT YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH!!! Type in English does not mean that you are superior than others! "unfortunately, i can't type chinese." This is the most ridiculous execuse of refusing to type in Chinese. Starting from Windows 2000, M$ has supported Chinese input. 此文章於 2004-09-25 06:18 AM 被 SoftPig 編輯. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Oct 2003 您的住址: 美國啦
文章: 167
|
引用:
從Windows2000開始,M$就開始支援中文輸入,更不用說是Linux和Mac了。不能打中文是一個很爛的藉口。 老實說,根據他英文的通順程度,我懷疑他是火星來的移民...... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001 您的住址: US
文章: 159
|
as i said, you can ignore my post if you want to. i never said i am superior than anyone. i am sure your language talent is much better than mine. so if you can't understand my post, just ignore it.
i am using english version of xp. it support multi-language input. however, it doesn't mean i have the ability to type in French or German. the OS supported doesn't means i can do that. btw, hows the weather over there? 引用:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Advance Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 堆滿慾望的城堡裡
文章: 406
|
引用:
但是... 似乎變熱了... http://www.pcpop.com/news/04/9/47679.shtml |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Golden Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: May 2002
文章: 3,163
|
引用:
小弟受教了 自己就是在用 INTEL 875chip 加 PCI-X 加 3ware raid的組合 沒去算計到INTEL 875的BUS竟然這麼窄 ![]() ![]()
__________________
往事只能回憶 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Master Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: May 2004 您的住址: 桃園
文章: 2,371
|
不知道有哪位大大可以把說英文的文章翻譯一下...
以嘉惠吾等英文文盲 ....=.= |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jun 2003 您的住址: Beverly Hills, CA
文章: 1,112
|
引用:
他大致上是說他不想使用中文...(打字太慢... ![]() 可是中文又是他的母語... ![]() 而且他用英文表達的用法就是這樣.不在乎你怎麼看 (文法有點瑕疵就是... ![]() 意思還勉強看得懂啦... ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Dec 2002
文章: 512
|
引用:
不對歐,不是266mbps跟1gbps,這樣比是錯的 amd 8131直接靠HT跟CPU相連,通道寬度是6.4 gbps 而875跟彼此ich-s是靠Hl1.5相連,通道頻寬是0.266 gbps 所以看通道相連的流量,他們差距的24倍 當然...6.4gbps是太寬了,一般是用不到,但是8131可以串接 而且8131是兩組獨立pci-x 133,單顆可以有2.1gbps的介面流量 假如拿三顆8131串起來就有6 gbps的流量,這時HT就有用了 而ICH-S只有一組pci-x 66,介面流量的寬度是0.53gbps 所以跟8131比也是差了四倍。ICH-S比較奇怪的地方就是這邊 他有一組0.53gbps的pci-x 66,還有一組0.13gbps的pci 2.2 加上ide介面頻寬也要吃很多,usb介面,一堆有的沒的東西 這些東西通通要塞進0.266 gbps的Hl 1.5裡,實際效用剩多少? 不過這兩個東西,本來就是市場定位不同的產品 ich-s相較之下看起來當然很爛,但他幾乎是最廉價的64bit pci方案 Intel也有強的pci-x晶片,那跟8131一樣,也是鎖定server用的 |
|
![]() |
![]() |