|
||
|
*停權中*
加入日期: May 2000
文章: 7,451
|
別人怎樣難說....
但小弟的意志力不是那麼堅定..... 然後會告訴自己，為了壓DV影片，為了Doom3....買超高檔的AMD CPU和公司的4600是應該的！嗯，就是這樣！喵！ |
|||||||
2002-05-25, 01:46 AM
#41
|
|
|
Master Member
  加入日期: Sep 2001 您的住址: K
文章: 1,504
|
我覺得重點不是遊戲
而是它的3D引擎啊... 以後會用這引擎的..相信會有一拖拉庫的遊戲 到那時再換顯示卡好了... |
||
|
2002-05-25, 02:20 AM
#42
|
|
|
Elite Member
加入日期: May 2001
文章: 4,948
|
看了就想玩.....唉...沒錢....~____~....
__________________
懶人相機.......   愛一個人！要了解，也要開解；要道歉，也要道謝； 要認錯，也要改錯；要體貼，也要體諒。是接受，而不是忍受； 是寬容，而不是縱容；是支持，而不是支配；是慰問，而不是質問； 是傾訴，而不是控訴；是難忘，而不是遺忘；是彼此交流，而不是凡事交代； 是為對方默默祈求，而不是向對方諸多要求。可以浪漫，但不要浪費； 可以隨時牽手，但不要隨便分手。如果你都做到了， 即使你不再愛一個人，也只有懷念，而不會懷恨。 你懂得如何去愛了嗎？試試看吧！ "If you love someone, let it be and set him/her free, if he/she comes back to you, it's meant to be" 如果你愛一個人，隨遇而安，讓他/她自由的飛， 如果最後他/她還是回到你身邊，那就是命中注定的。 |
|
2002-05-25, 02:46 AM
#43
|
|
|
Advance Member
加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: 臺中市
文章: 467
|
傳說中的NV30，我想可能也不是DOOM III的對手
__________________
 好美的中島美嘉 
|
|
2002-05-25, 07:22 AM
#44
|
|
|
Master Member
加入日期: Jun 2001 您的住址: 中和
文章: 1,760
|
超逼真的!!!!!
如果惡靈古堡用這引擎來寫一定超棒 以後的Game除了標示年齡限制 大概還會有"心臟疾病患者不得購買"之類的 不過我用了好久的Voodoo3 本來最近想換G4 Ti4200 看來又要等一等了 QQ
__________________
|
|
2002-05-25, 11:23 PM
#45
|
|
|
Junior Member
加入日期: Apr 2002
文章: 733
|
嗯嗯 有要敗家ㄌ....
|
|
2002-05-25, 11:35 PM
#46
|
|
|
*停權中*
加入日期: Feb 2002
文章: 2,248
|
很高興看到這種等級的3D畫面......
3D遊戲終於從醜醜的馬賽克 進步到"看不太出來是貼出來的". 3D技術差距越來越大.....恐怕會變成另外一種獨占事業. 還是做軟體比較有錢途.....ex....M$. 執行的硬體要求不是啥大問題.....2.2G...還好吧. 只是INTEL喜歡把可以跑2G的CPU標成1.6G來賣. |
|
2002-05-26, 01:06 AM
#47
|
|
|
Amateur Member
 加入日期: Jan 2002 您的住址: 目前英國
文章: 49
|
|
|
2002-05-26, 01:20 AM
#48
|
|
|
Power Member
 
加入日期: Jan 2001 您的住址: 高雄市
文章: 561
|
哎~~~剛買的g550一定不夠用~~~~
看來只有去網咖玩的份了。
__________________
意志啟發成功 熱情創造永恆 |
|
2002-05-26, 01:33 AM
#49
|
|
|
Golden Member
加入日期: Nov 2000 您的住址: 戰星卡拉狄加
文章: 3,822
|
引用:
翻譯過的反而讓人看不懂 還是看原文吧  ---------------------------------------------- In order from best to worst for Doom: I still think that overall, the GeForce 4 Ti is the best card you can buy. It has high speed and excellent driver quality. Based on the feature set, the Radeon 8500 should be a faster card for Doom than the GF4, because it can do the seven texture accesses that I need in a single pass, while it takes two or three passes (depending on details) on the GF4. However, in practice, the GF4 consistently runs faster due to a highly efficient implementation. For programmers, the 8500 has a much nicer fragment path than the GF4, with more general features and increased precision, but the driver quality is still quite a ways from Nvidia's, so I would be a little hesitant to use it as a primary research platform. The GF4-MX is a very fast card for existing games, but it is less well suited to Doom, due to the lower texture unit count and the lack of vertex shaders. On a slow CPU with all features enabled, the GF3 will be faster than the GF4-MX, because it offloads some work. On systems with CPU power to burn, the GF4 may still be faster. The 128 bit DDR GF2 systems will be faster than the Radeon-7500 systems, again due to low level implementation details overshadowing the extra texture unit. The slowest cards will be the 64 bit and SDR ram GF and Radeon cards, which will really not be fast enough to play the game properly unless you run at 320x240 or so. |
|
|
2002-05-26, 02:18 AM
#50
|
|
