![]() |
||
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: May 2002
文章: 686
|
我是分析強項在哪,我不是再分析多少錢。
引用:
同時脈來比K8是很屌,但是他還屌不過同時脈的多森。 |
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Major Member
![]() 加入日期: Dec 2001 您的住址: US
文章: 159
|
it was an example, ok?
and nowadays. who only run ONE program at a time? without doing anything, windows is running at least 5 program background. how about this? you can play games and run BT at the same time. or doing dvd encording and internet at the same time? the HT let you do more things at the same time and "feel" more smooth. i think that's a great thing. (for normal user) for example, i do dv editing sometimes, and while it is encording, what should i do? wait there? no. i use internet and check emails. and still within reasonable internet speed. but, if you just need to run game and want the best fps available, then AMD. 引用:
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
Elite Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jul 2003 您的住址: Großdeutschland
文章: 6,997
|
就絕大部分的用途, K8的表現明顯比P4來的令人振奮.
|
![]() |
![]() |
Junior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: taiwan
文章: 913
|
K8如果可以超到2.6G時脈的話,效能大約可以追上3.6G的P4吧.
不過如果是玩GAME的話,大概2.3G就可以追上3.6G的P4了. 但是目前K8要用普通風冷方法超2.6G的話,機率不是太高. 但K8小超2.3G應該就比較容易了. 結論是玩GAME的選K8,要轉檔或圖像算圖,就選P4吧.
__________________
HI! I LIKE MUTIMEDIA! |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jun 2002 您的住址: 彰化<===>高雄
文章: 1,020
|
引用:
同時脈...........@@ Dothan......時脈上不去阿!!!~~~@@ K8導入90奈米後....時脈會更驚人!! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Power Member
![]() ![]() 加入日期: Mar 2003 您的住址: 台北
文章: 597
|
引用:
你會不會想太多 同時脈的k8和Dothan效能只是半斤八兩 而且其實Dothan還是比不上k8 因為Dothan若是贏的話都是贏不到5%,而且項目很少 但是k8贏都是海k Dothan 如Maya,3d studio max 而且這只是拿單通道L2 512k的k8來比而已唷 另外k8的時脈潛力更是Dothan望塵莫及的 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
*停權中*
加入日期: Apr 2001 您的住址: 冰島
文章: 1,558
|
引用:
對呀...有強過K8嗎 ?? 明明效能就55波呀 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jan 2004
文章: 1,205
|
謝謝各位大大
可能最近買個K8 3000+來玩囉 |
![]() |
![]() |
Junior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jun 2002 您的住址: 台南市
文章: 734
|
這個還要問,當然是3600+啊
否則AMD的PR值是怎麼標的?? |
![]() |
![]() |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() 加入日期: Jul 2002 您的住址: 光碟托盤
文章: 1,495
|
引用:
2.8EG or 2.4CG @ 3.6 可是比 3.6EG 快不少 快150% 的 FSB 不是玩的 ![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |