Yes, which is why the question people supporting prostitution should ask is "would I want my daughter doing this and why or why not?"

It's not "I don't want my daughter doing this so neither should you let your daughter."



Forcing beliefs onto others is a strong accusation. People are just offering their views on prostitution. Condemning an act is not forcing people not to do it.

Regardless, there is no conflict in the golden rule stated. You keep repeating that people have different values but fail to grasp the very concept of the golden rule....it is based on people's own values.



Not sure where you got that from. All I said was no parents (loving ones, at least) would want their daughters to be whores but nothing of forcing them to. Remember I said if the undergrads are fine with their daughters being whores, then it's nobody's business. If not, then they, according to their own values, believe it to be wrong for one reason or the other. That view on value is just similar to mine, but not mine.



Being whatever kind of feminist is irrelevant. There's a significant number of feminists see prostitution as men's way to degrade and objectify women and are highly against it, so I wouldn't use that card to rationalize prostitution, much less putting emphasis on what type of feminist she is as if that was the main focus of the entire feminist movement.

Mutual human sex is based on spiritual connection (love) or just good old fashioned animal instinct (spread sperms, mate with the alpha male).

Of course, money has a way of making people do things they absolutely loathe, things they believe to be wrong, and still make them convince other people they are fine with it.

Your professor may very well be as liberated as she seems to be, but you can only know what she really thinks if her loved ones are involved. Otherwise, who knows, she may just be defending it for the sake of securing her extra source of income.

Again, I stress that if she is completely at ease with her daughter being a whore, then she truly believes prostitution is fine. If not, well there's your answer.

While you're at it, ask yourself the real reason you wouldn't want your daughter to sell sexual favors. Simply because the job doesn't pay well for the effort? Have a hard time believing a father would actually see his daughter's honor in a purely capitalistic way. You're not one are you?



Didn't know people are gay by choice.

我當然不能證明所有的日本人和德國人
所謂的證明就是日本的Soapland跟德國的FKK
至於台灣要最好不要性交易,我的看法就是目前的做法,
最好台灣有****易的話男的就把老二跺掉,女的看要如何就如何,看要用石頭砸死也好
因為我不住在台灣,所以跟我沒有關係

對你這種貨色.我何須有水準?我對我的發言一向負責啊..那麼可否請你如果覺得受污辱.
我絕對歡迎你去提告!!

恕你沒有美國時間陪我討論?好奇怪唷.那你現在又有蘇俄時間回這麼一大篇文!!你不就跟
我前面早已說過的一種人一樣...戰到後面.才在說:你好討厭.人家不跟你玩了...前面幾頁
才說過.現在你就又玩一次..那麼.現在你說我不看你的文..請問.你又完全去看了別人的文
?而且.你老玩一樣的手法.不嫌煩嗎?經過這些討論,發現不少網友的認知基礎根本不同,這
討論算是浪費時間了. 就到此為止..這是你在某篇第165則的回文....

你也不用跟我在這打爛仗..另一篇-那麼不孝....最後你躲哪去了?被圍攻到跑回家躲進棉被
哭去了!!跟你說吧.沒那個屌.就別出來亂甩...甩來甩去.連灰塵都沒你給帶起來.你不覺得丟
臉嗎?

你在其他至少兩篇.針對BMC的發言.身為人師,用字遣詞應多斟酌,良心建議....你又是什麼
咖校?公開針對他人職業.提你什麼良心建議?PCDVD沒有私人訊息這種東西?還是你假裝
不會用?你這種行為.比我潑婦罵街高明多少?應該是說.你陰損多了...

8歲上網****.國中生集體賣***.就代表心甘情願下海的比例高過非心甘情願??你做過市調?
還是你親身天天去採樣得到結果??然後.你有去探討你所舉的例子.為何她們要心甘情願去
下海??家庭教育沒出問題?就如你在那麼不孝中.堅持認為不生育下代就是不孝..但若你生
育了下代.卻教育的不負責任.男盜女娼.你又算盡到哪種孝道!!

我不用一篇篇去翻你在這邊的回文..就可以找到你是個甚麼樣的貨色的佐證.如你所指.我
是沒水準.我是很低賤.那麼.嚴格說起來,AV女優在A片中,只是助興(性)的工具,為何要對工
具有敬意?說這種話當上女人藉口的你.又算是啥?呵呵....

看你把那幾個行業寫在一起,而我提問的行業是AV相關,所以才有此誤解,是我沒看清楚,抱歉了.


你的回答理性得體,這才是討論.
另外那位,邏輯混亂,發文又沒水準,不值得花時間回他的文.

我要表達的是,每個人的想法不會都一樣,你的話說的太死了.

至於你的提議,雖然不可能實施,但若真的要實施,對我也沒有影響.
我沒嫖過,將來也不可能去嫖,雖然我住台灣,跟我也沒關係.

明明自己都會說:每個人想法不會都一樣...那他人話說死了.關你屁事?你又有何資格評斷?
啊..我忘了..就像我在前面說的..你明知道BMC是位老師.還專挑他的語病來勸人要斟酌用
詞!!!你是個什麼東西?又有何立場?你不挑破.誰知道他是位老師?你嘴巴犯賤.還好意思說
別人沒水準!!你看他沒反應.打蛇隨棍上.還連抓兩篇語病...不知你這種行為叫做什麼?還好
意思.在這邊顯擺...R兄..臉皮不要厚到這種程度嘛!!





既然我發文沒水準.不值得你回文.結果.你又專程寫了這一段.不算回應??那你的邏輯比我
還不正常唷!!..呵呵..合你心意.才是討論..不合你心意.皆是下流!!我了解了...

那你這位(假)清高之士.還在這篇充滿下流語調之文章中沉淪是為何??別又犯賤了.快滾出
去吧!!