PCDVD數位科技討論區
PCDVD數位科技討論區   註冊 常見問題 標記討論區為已讀

回到   PCDVD數位科技討論區 > 其他群組 > 七嘴八舌異言堂
帳戶
密碼
 

  回應
 
主題工具
Toluba
*停權中*
 

加入日期: Dec 2004
文章: 412
引用:
作者神騎士
V=m/s 有沒有人敢寫 速率=公尺 X 頻率 ?

這裡你就錯了 頻率的單位是 one cycle / second
只要符合one cycle 的定義 它可以是 一圈圈 一次次...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Hertz

In 1930 the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) honored Hertz by naming the unit of frequency—one cycle per second—the "hertz".

我真的不曉得你是哪裡有問題,你有看過有人寫cycle/s ?
你要不要查一下cycle是什麼意思?

1/s是1/秒,也就是Hz,也就是頻率的單位
其意義就是one cycle per second

如果我講這麼明白你還不懂,你還是回去找你的物理老師渡化你吧
     
      
舊 2013-11-29, 11:19 AM #191
回應時引用此文章
Toluba離線中  
oversky.
Junior Member
 

加入日期: Feb 2013
文章: 760
http://www.aqua-calc.com/what-is/fr...ycle-per-second

A cycle per second (cycle/s) is an obsolete unit of frequency. The unit is replaced by the SI unit of frequency hertz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz#History
The hertz is named after the German physicist Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894), who made important scientific contributions to the study of electromagnetism. The name was established by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in 1930.[6] It was adopted by the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) (Conférence générale des poids et mesures) in 1960, replacing the previous name for the unit, cycles per second (cps), along with its related multiples, primarily kilocycles per second (kc/s) and megacycles per second (Mc/s), and occasionally kilomegacycles per second (kMc/s). The term cycles per second was largely replaced by hertz by the 1970s.
 
舊 2013-11-29, 11:46 AM #192
回應時引用此文章
oversky.離線中  
Toluba
*停權中*
 

加入日期: Dec 2004
文章: 412
引用:
作者oversky.
http://www.aqua-calc.com/what-is/frequency/cycle-per-second

A cycle per second (cycle/s) is an obsolete unit of frequency. The unit is replaced by the SI unit of frequency hertz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz#History
The hertz is named after the German physicist Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894), who made important scientific contributions to the study of electromagnetism. The name was established by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in 1930.[6] It was adopted by the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) (Conference generale des poids et mesures) in 1960, replacing the previous name for the unit, cycles per second (cps), along with its related multiples, primarily kilocycles per second (kc/s...

嗯........

如果你要這樣表示頻率單位,那週期單位是否也該改成s/cycle ?

此文章於 2013-11-29 11:57 AM 被 Toluba 編輯.
舊 2013-11-29, 11:52 AM #193
回應時引用此文章
Toluba離線中  
oversky.
Junior Member
 

加入日期: Feb 2013
文章: 760
引用:
作者Toluba
嗯........

如果你要這樣表示頻率單位,那週期單位是否也該改成s/cycle ?


我沒有那麼老。
舊 2013-11-29, 12:56 PM #194
回應時引用此文章
oversky.離線中  
oversky.
Junior Member
 

加入日期: Feb 2013
文章: 760
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_per_second

Nonetheless, the change is not without its critics, who argue that the hertz should be redefined as simply a renaming of the cycle per second it displaced, rather than as the reciprocal second[citation needed]. Since SI has adopted the radian as its preferred but dimensionless unit of angle, but left its explicit writing discretionary in unit combinations, the radian per second has perhaps a better claim than the cycle per second to being equivalent to the reciprocal second. But the hertz is overwhelmingly (some would say exclusively) used in the sense of cycle per second, and certainly never used in the sense of radian per second.

以前也有吵過。就像 fourier transform,有的書寫 f*t,有的書寫 omega*t。

此文章於 2013-11-29 01:39 PM 被 oversky. 編輯.
舊 2013-11-29, 01:36 PM #195
回應時引用此文章
oversky.離線中  
神騎士
Regular Member
 
神騎士的大頭照
 

加入日期: Jul 2003
您的住址: 神之領
文章: 56
引用:
作者oversky.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_per_second

Nonetheless, the change is not without its critics, who argue that the hertz should be redefined as simply a renaming of the cycle per second it displaced, rather than as the reciprocal second[citation needed]. Since SI has adopted the radian as its preferred but dimensionless unit of angle, but left its explicit writing discretionary in unit combinations, the radian per second has perhaps a better claim than the cycle per second to being equivalent to the reciprocal second. But the hertz is overwhelmingly (some would say exclusively) used in the sense of cycle per second, and certainly never used in the sense of radian per second.

以前也有吵過。就像 fourier transform,有的書寫 f*t,有的書...


好像本版以前也吵過 都被課本上的簡化計算用公式給害了
舊 2013-11-29, 01:43 PM #196
回應時引用此文章
神騎士離線中  
神騎士
Regular Member
 
神騎士的大頭照
 

加入日期: Jul 2003
您的住址: 神之領
文章: 56
Wink

引用:
作者oversky.
http://www.aqua-calc.com/what-is/frequency/cycle-per-second

A cycle per second (cycle/s) is an obsolete unit of frequency. The unit is replaced by the SI unit of frequency hertz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz#History
The hertz is named after the German physicist Heinrich Hertz (1857–1894), who made important scientific contributions to the study of electromagnetism. The name was established by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) in 1930.[6] It was adopted by the General Conference on Weights and Measures (CGPM) (Conference generale des poids et mesures) in 1960, replacing the previous name for the unit, cycles per second (cps), along with its related multiples, primarily kilocycles per second (kc/s...


感謝提供完整資訊
舊 2013-11-29, 01:46 PM #197
回應時引用此文章
神騎士離線中  


    回應


POPIN
主題工具

發表文章規則
不可以發起新主題
不可以回應主題
不可以上傳附加檔案
不可以編輯您的文章

vB 代碼打開
[IMG]代碼打開
HTML代碼關閉



所有的時間均為GMT +8。 現在的時間是09:10 PM.


vBulletin Version 3.0.1
powered_by_vbulletin 2025。