瀏覽單個文章
oversky.
Junior Member
 

加入日期: Feb 2013
文章: 783
引用:
作者LDSKING
同時,呼籲改採RT-LAMB快篩的聲浪也愈來愈大。RT-LAMB快篩已經在英國貝廣泛使用,不但跟目前德國所用的PCR檢測同等精確,且要價不到10歐元(台幣約350元)


https://healthcare-in-europe.com/en...30-minutes.html
引用:
The RT-LAMP test for SARS-CoV-2 successfully detected the virus in all human sample types that were spiked with SARS-CoV-2 genetic material, within 30 to 45 minutes, with an estimated limit of detection of as few as 304 viral copies in a sample. Importantly, the test did not detect virus in samples spiked with RNA other coronaviruses, demonstrating specificity for SARS-CoV-2. In clinical mouth swab samples, RT-LAMP was positive for 95% (19/20) of samples positive by qRT-PCR and negative for 90% (18/20) of samples that were negative by qRT-PCR. The researchers note that those discrepancies between the methods could represent either false positives by the RT-LAMP, contamination or increased sensitivity of RT-LAMP compared to qRT-PCR. The current study was not powered to determine sensitivity in a clinical population.
 
舊 2020-08-25, 01:27 PM #292
回應時引用此文章
oversky.離線中