|
Junior Member
|
https://www.praguemorning.cz/80-of-...hina-are-wrong/
引用:
However, according to seznamzpravy.cz, doctors and hygienists were informed that this might happen. Indeed, the rapid tests that arrived from China a few days ago do not reliably detect the infection at an early stage.
According to a document of the National Institute of Public Health, rapid tests have only a “supporting role” in testing.
The institute explained that these tests cannot detect the virus in the first five to seven days after being infected as the person has yet to start producing coronavirus antibodies in the blood. The rapid tests are based on detecting these antibodies, though.
“The test is not a diagnostic test,” the National Institute of Public Health stated.
In other words, it is better to use these tests at the end of the 14- days quarantine period to confirm if the person suspected of having coronavirus is indeed infected.
Hygienists in Ostrava have already announced that they will introduce such a system, using the tests on people who were placed under preventive quarantine but not tested.
|
看來是要先隔離十四天，等疑似患者產生抗體後再測。
https://www.storm.mg/article/2430455
引用:
有媒體在21日的疫情指揮中心記者會提問，南韓每日可篩檢1萬多件篩檢案件，且南韓的人口約為台灣的2.2倍，但台灣目前每日僅能篩檢3000多件，檢驗量能相差3倍以上，究竟台灣和南韓的差異在哪裡？
陳時中對此回應，台灣這兩日篩檢1300多個案件，而台、韓兩邊在策略上有很大的不同，南韓的策略是做「普篩」，意即全部的人都做篩檢；台灣則是針對有特定風險及特定條件的人才進行篩檢。
陳時中也說，目前「PCR篩檢」的精密度和準確性最高，但其中還是有偽陰性的可能，所以專家認為，「在有症狀時篩檢，判斷才會正確」，也間接避免篩檢出偽陰性的可能；此外，若民眾有特定風險的情況才做篩檢，也以利後續進行適當的分流和隔離。
陳時中最後表示，每個國家對分流和管制的見解及作法都不同，不能說誰對誰錯，但每個國家在做決策時，都會依據現有的科學證據及專家的判斷，將政策做得更加完善。
|
台灣目前居家檢疫是觀察十四天，
出現症狀者送醫採檢。
那無症狀患者會在十四天後，
除了出現症狀及自愈這兩種情況外，
不會有變成無症狀帶原者的嗎？
捷克隔離完再驗一次的作法(沒說要用大陸的快篩哦)是不是比較保險一點？
|