瀏覽單個文章
Adsmt
Golden Member
 
Adsmt的大頭照
 

加入日期: Feb 2004
您的住址: 從來處來
文章: 2,766
引用:
作者Crazynut
擷文,圖放不下
“Peano axioms” can be found today in numerous textbooks in a form similar to our list in Section 9.2. But the original Peano axioms were quite different. First of all, the notion of a natural number (a member of the set &#8469 was taken as a primitive, and there were explicit axioms stating that zero and its successors are natural numbers. Also Peano used a language richer than first-order logic. There was a single induction axiom, involving quantification over sets, and there were no axioms for addition and multiplication (Example 12.2.2(iv) explains why). Peano’s system can thus be more adequately represented in second-order logic (see Chapters 11 and 12). A minor difference is that his numbers began with 1, not 0.

你誤會這段話的意思,而且也劃錯重點,裡面就有寫了
there were explicit axioms stating that zero and its successors are natural numbers.

但皮亞諾在二階邏輯(second-order logic)卻又把自然數的起始定為1

因為一階邏輯的定義比較前面,而且我們現在談的都是一階邏輯,所以皮亞諾實際上仍是把自然數之始定為 0.
     
      
舊 2020-02-12, 02:46 PM #61
回應時引用此文章
Adsmt離線中