引用:
作者JeiJei
其他地方我不敢講,但只從中文新聞跟Wikipedia看阿根廷?真的是
你有去過那裡嗎?你知道當地的人情事務是怎樣的嗎?麻煩去了解了以後再來找資料來跟我講阿根廷。
那我憑什麼呢?就憑我在那長大,我家現在在那裡還有親人跟資產。所以那裡的實際民情跟狀況我可以說比版上99.99%的人都要清楚。你假如一輩子都沒跟阿根廷人打過交道,憑什麼說你知道阿根廷發生了什麼事?還不是這裡抓一篇,那裡抓一段的來湊出的觀點。
|
痾 是嘛 這些是我以前從書上跟Wikipedia了解 不過我不是為了瞭解阿根廷才知道
我當時只是無意在書上看到的東西 阿根廷只是其中一個被老美強姦的國家
台灣又沒出這方面的書 最快就繞Wikipedia 不然你講清楚一點
至於新聞嗎 我只是說 聽老美早晚就是那種下場 只要被綑仙索套上 很少有人跳出來
不過說個題外話
Washington Consensus
Original sense: Williamson's Ten Points
The concept and name of the Washington Consensus were first presented in 1989 by John Williamson, an economist from the Institute for International Economics, an international economic think tank based in Washington, D.C.[3] Williamson used the term to summarize commonly shared themes among policy advice by Washington-based institutions at the time, such as the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and U.S. Treasury Department, which were believed to be necessary for the recovery of countries in Latin America from the economic and financial crises of the 1980s.[citation needed]
The consensus as originally stated by Williamson included ten broad sets of relatively specific policy recommendations:[1]
1.Fiscal policy discipline, with avoidance of large fiscal deficits relative to GDP;
2.Redirection of public spending from subsidies ("especially indiscriminate subsidies") toward broad-based provision of key pro-growth, pro-poor services like primary education, primary health care and infrastructure investment;
3.Tax reform, broadening the tax base and adopting moderate marginal tax rates;
4.Interest rates that are market determined and positive (but moderate) in real terms;
5.Competitive exchange rates;
6.Trade liberalization: liberalization of imports, with particular emphasis on elimination of quantitative restrictions (licensing, etc.); any trade protection to be provided by low and relatively uniform tariffs;
7.Liberalization of inward foreign direct investment;
8.Privatization of state enterprises;
9.Deregulation: abolition of regulations that impede market entry or restrict competition, except for those justified on safety, environmental and consumer protection grounds, and prudential oversight of financial institutions;
10.Legal security for property rights.
這Washington Consensus 最後面 6~10怎麼跟中美貿易戰上 美國對中國的要求87像
拉丁美洲那些國家 好像就IMF老美第一批經濟改革白老鼠 再後來就蘇聯東歐國
不就像美國老愛酸中國一帶一路 是債務陷阱一樣
中國如果在貿易戰 首肯 下場就跟前蘇聯一樣 不過照中國目前這情況 美國應該沒啥機會
還有 我甚麼時候說我在IC設計業界 我自己也不知道