要求比BF4還高...問題是畫面呢?
Amazon又是壓倒性一星評價
隨便引一個Amazon的Mike的意見...
"Next gen" this game is not. COD: Ghosts is ugly, iterative, repetitive, and everything else the COD franchise has become...,
Definitely doesn't look next gen. The previous couple Battlefield games looked much better than this, and I'm coming from the point of having a pretty capable gaming rig that should make this game look great...but it just does not. The texture quality is awful, and in all honestly it looks no different than previous COD installments.

Doesn't play any different, either...there's a couple new modes like a hunger games type thing, and some improved co-op, but beyond that this franchise continues to iterate on what it's already done.

In my honest opinion, Black Ops 2 looked and played better than this supposed "next gen" title. In a few years, when we have seen REAL next gen capabilities, we'll look back and laugh at this joke.

Gamespot.com recently gave a very low score to Batman: Arkham Origins...claiming that the game was too iterative and didn't innovate. And yet, COD: Ghosts does exactly this (in fact, COD games in general have been like this since MW1) and the game gets an 8.0 out of 10? It's clear who butters the bread of these so called "journalists".

Don't buy the hype, and don't buy this game.