引用:
|
作者albert@46
嚇死我了!! 拿張PANA的宣傳單耶!! 好威!! 
一般測試是在實驗室測的.還要扣掉環境背光亮度
誰需要跟外行人定義
發光效率? 妳把亮度調到最高就明白了!! 何必在此多言.別坳啦
LED發光效率技術當然做得到越來越亮
但是也要考慮量產以及價錢還有整機搭配度
懂嗎?
您似乎不明白何謂是家? 是這樣嗎? |
http://www.avforums.com/reviews/Pan...196/Review.html
As with the previous review of the P50VT30 we measured the P65VT30 with our Klein K-10 in dark surroundings and calibrated mode we got 0.02 cd/m2 at 0IRE and 79.20 cd/m2 at 100IRE using standard window patterns from our Sencore MP500 - this equates to an on/off contrast ratio of 3,960:1.
By comparison our 2 year old Pioneer LX5090 Kuro measured 0.03 cd/m2 at 0IRE and 109.80 cd/m2 at 100IRE in dark surroundings and a calibrated mode - this equates to an on/off contrast ratio of 3,660:1. The ANSI contrast ratio measurements on the Pioneer were 0.04 cd/m2 for black and 84.90 cd/m2 for white which equates to 2,122:1, whilst the P65VT30 measured 0.03 cd/m2 black and 73.10 cd/m2 which equates to 2,437:1.
-------------------------------------------------------
1. P65VT30這樣的純黑表現若您覺得還不夠好... 請告訴版上大家您認為要到怎樣的數據才算是您認為的好? 以及目前隨便舉幾款那些的純黑表現是您認為的更好的LED/CCFL背光液晶?
2. 還有令人更覺得自然的是色階數表現, 請問目前LED/CCFL背光液晶電視, 高階等級的可分辨色階數多半落在多少?
3. 您定義的家中應用, 一台電視不管是電漿/液晶, 要衝高到多高的亮度值才夠用?
您上面的回答全都是空泛的情緒用語, 完全沒有提出確切數據; 既然您在乎數據, 認為您是內行人... 那麼也請提出確切數據來教教版上這些愛好電漿的外行人們...
