引用:
|
作者A級黑豬肉
I did use critical thinking to counter people with different opinions from mine, it is my way to prove them wrong and lack of consideration on all sort of things. Critical thinking force you to think from different perspective, not within, in order for you to decide what to do or what to believe.
|
You can't "counter" an opinion; you can only offer a different one, thus your perspective wasn't a proof but merely another one.
One can still come to the conclusion that selling sex is wrong despite having considered all things. Other factors only help you understand why some people may take this route, they don't justify the action.
引用:
|
作者A級黑豬肉
Problem with golden rule is the differences in value. As it's shown in this thread, two groups have different value in sex work; thus golden rule will conflict itself and should no longer be in the context of debate. Not only the debate itself is conflicted, a lot of high morality people here conflict themselves with golden rule in different situation, just as Immanuel Kent stated in his book. An example is the quote above from "vircgd"..
|
There actually isn't any conflict, what makes it golden is because the value is based on each his own, not others. If these Harvard undergrads don't want their daughters or moms exchanging sex for money, it means, based on their own value, that they disapprove it as a way to make money.
While you may be against because of the risk vs rewards, I assure you, that is not what most people base on when they are against relatives using prostitution as a legitimate of making money, Asians or Caucasians.