特效二圖：
解析度：1680*1050
能調的都調到最大
VIEW DISTANCE：34
ATI 4830測試BENCHMARK RESULTS 圖：
測試結果：
平均張數：33.51張
Statistics
Average FPS: 33.51
Duration: 37.06 sec
CPU Usage: 61%
System memory usage: 77%
Video memory usage: 79%
Graphics Settings
Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz)
Texture Quality: Medium
Render Quality: Very High
View Distance: 34
Detail Distance: 100
Hardware
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Service Pack 3
Video Adapter: ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series
Video Driver version: 6.14.10.6891
Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output
AMD Phenom(tm) 9950 Quad-Core Processor
File ID: Benchmark.cli
NV 9800 測試BENCHMARK RESULTS 圖：
測試結果：
平均張數：30.62張
Statistics
Average FPS: 30.62
Duration: 37.46 sec
CPU Usage: 54%
System memory usage: 75%
Video memory usage: 96%
Graphics Settings
Video Mode: 1680 x 1050 (60 Hz)
Texture Quality: Medium
Render Quality: Very High
View Distance: 34
Detail Distance: 100
Hardware
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Service Pack 3
Video Adapter: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Video Driver version: 182.08
Audio Adapter: Realtek HD Audio output
AMD Phenom(tm) 9950 Quad-Core Processor
File ID: benchmark.cli
總整理表：
總結：要做個總結其實很痛苦，因為不知道該怎評比，本身也不是POWER USER算是一個學生喜歡玩測試而已，剛好學弟那邊又有資源XD，看看這精美的DELL 750W銀牌(流口水)，芝奇DDR2-1066 2G XD，反正呢整體看來我覺得在這價位帶的選擇還是4830為主，畢竟開高反鋸齒反線性和解析度、特效是一定的趨勢，不然我買電腦幹嗎?換顯示卡幹嗎?翻桌(／‵Д′)／~ ╧╧