大家秀一下SPECviewperf的成績吧
 

SPECviewperfR~專業的OPEN GL測試軟體

http://www.specbench.org/gpc/downloadindex.html


ELSA GTS PRO

---------- sum_results\AWADVS\summary.txt
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 60.72

---------- sum_results\DRV\summary.txt
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 15.70

---------- sum_results\DX\summary.txt
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.83

---------- sum_results\Light\summary.txt
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 5.196

---------- sum_results\MedMCAD\summary.txt
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.27

---------- sum_results\ProCDRS\summary.txt
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 12.75



改ELSA GloriaIII

---------- sum_results\AWADVS\summary.txt
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 59.24

---------- sum_results\DRV\summary.txt
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 15.38

---------- sum_results\DX\summary.txt
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.72

---------- sum_results\Light\summary.txt
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 5.195

---------- sum_results\MedMCAD\summary.txt
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 25.55

---------- sum_results\ProCDRS\summary.txt
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 33.70

兩百多MB 哇勒太大了吧

那就抓6.12的~才55MB
我上面的成績是6.12的

AMD XP1800+
ELSA GLADIAC525 128MB 未超頻

6.12版
---------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 74.38

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.38

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 29.58

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 7.459

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 19.20

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 21.30


7.0版
---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.151

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 23.71

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 29.31

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-05 Weighted Geometric Mean = 8.087

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 6.538

---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 3.768


看來Gloria跑CAD的威力 TI4200還是追不上....

測試平台:
1.Gigabyte GA-8IHXP Ver2.1(Bios:F3)
2.Intel Pentium4 2.53G ES
3.KingSton PC1066 RDRAM 128MBx4
4.Suma Platinum GeForce4 Ti4200SE 128MB (nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200)
5.Seagate Barracuda ATAIV 40GB 7200rpm (NTFS5)
6.Pioneer DVD-106S
7.Delta 350W PSU
8.Swiftech MCX-462 w/ Delta FFB0812EHE Fan
9.Microsoft Windows XP Professional
10.Intel INF Update Utility 4.00.1013
11.Intel Application Accelerator 2.2
12.nVidia Detonator XP 29.42

測試結果:
SPEC Viewperf 7.0 Suite
此時的顯卡時脈設定為GPU:320MHz / MEM:740MHz
處理器為150x19=2.85GHz


不過這種討論貼在"效能極限區"會比較好才是....:)

CPU: Athlom XP1700+
VGA: MSI Geforce 3 Ti200 64MB
OS: WIN 2000 PRO
Driver: nVidia Detonator XP 29.60

6.12版

---------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 68.24

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 21.80

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 30.29

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 8.680

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 23.07

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 14.01

-------------------------------------------------------
以下是我用RivaTuner 把卡軟改為Quadro DCC(驅動程式一樣是29.60)

--------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 61.82

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.14

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 26.99

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.383

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 30.46

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 12.79

只有一個MEDMCAD有比較顯著的提升,其他都差不多甚至下降
有人知道那是測什麼的嗎?
另外有沒有人是改電阻成Quadro DCC 的...不知道差距多大?

原來我上面改完卡後AWADVS 下降蠻多的...
這個測試是Alias/Wavefront MAYA 的效能...反而下降了
而我是MAYA的使用者,看來效能號像不如未改之前
我是不是錯了...>_<...還好是用軟改可以在改回來

AMD XP1800+(6/30購入)
MSI K7T266Pro2
Kingston DDR266 256MBx2
Leadtek GF2MX>改電阻>Quadro2MXR(200/210)

---------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 51.52

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 20.14

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 30.03

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 9.795

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 28.15

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 21.29

GF3 or QuadroDCC 的MedMCAD & ProCDRS本來就比GF2差, 可是我記得GF3的AWadvs-04 應該可以破百

Adol Christin大大,可否再測個6.12版,這可是我的夢想配備,很想砸錢又怕後悔...

Re: 大家秀一下SPECviewperf的成績吧
 

補~
CPU~AMD Althon ThunderBird 1GHZ (FSB=266)
MB~Gigabyte 7ZXRC KT133A
RAM~Transcend 256MB CL3 (Run CL2)
HD~Seagate Barracuda III 30G ATA100 (AVR=38MB/S)
VGA~ELSA GTS PRO 32MB DDR(28.32)
OS~Windows 98 se

用NVSTRAP改ELSA GloriaIII