Parhelia-512 的 (Benchmarks)
 

http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthr...readid=33622002

Sooo, all you binder haters and naysayers out there... Who all think im some unfair, biased stooge

Straight from MaximumPC, benchmarks of a beta PArhelia.The system consisted of a P4 2Ghz w/ 512 Megs Ram. They ran the Quake III Benches at 1280x1024 @ 32 bit color, 3DMark 2001 was at 1024x768@32 bit color.


No AA, No anisotropic filtering
Quake 3: 72.1fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game2 High Detail : 56.3 fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game4: 21.1 fps
3DMark 2001 SE Default Score: 7698

16x AA, no anisotropic filtering
Quake 3: Would Not Run
3dmark 2001 SE Game2 High Detail : 47.7 fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game4: 15.0 fps
3DMark 2001 SE Default Score: 6089

No AA, anisotropic filtering On
Quake 3: 56.6fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game2 High Detail : 45.5 fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game4: 10.98 fps
3DMark 2001 SE Default Score: 6526

16x AA, anisotropic filtering On
Quake 3: Would Not Run
3dmark 2001 SE Game2 High Detail : 40.1 fps
3dmark 2001 SE Game4: 8.9 fps
3DMark 2001 SE Default Score: 5241

Now, does this sound like a card that you want to pay 400$ for? or that is even a worthy next-gen product? I dont think so. granted this is on "beta" hardware and dirvers. But R300 in the same condition is already 20% faster than a GF4 ti 4600.

Parhelia-512 july/august 399$
R300 August/Sept 299$

In fact my Radeon 8500 has the same or better performance except for FSAA, and only costs 150$ now.

I rest my case.


__________________
The New-
P4 2.4ghz (533)
512mb 40ns RDram
MSI GF4 Ti 4200 oc295/295 ;)

The old-
Athlon 1600+_ECS K7S5A
384mb PC2100 DDR RAM
Radeon 8500 275/275
Windows XP


Last edited by Hellbinder on 06-12-2002 at 10:06 PM

很夢幻的價格....

分數沒很高....可能是CPU不夠力吧.....
16x AA!?
分數沒降很多耶....
我才開4xAA分數就腰斬了...

2D應該還是能維持以往的高水準吧......

16 XAA 反鋸齒 ON
3DMark 2001 SE Default Score: 5241

可見怕黑啦的256bits記憶體頻寬 在這上面起了極大的影響

何況怕黑啦的核心時脈這麼低.........

可能出個進階版就又要有榨不完的效能了:eek:

Re: Parhelia-512 的 (Benchmarks)
 

若真是這樣，那Parhelia的c/p值就實在太低了
除非有品牌迷思，不然一般消費者很難花上400美金買一塊效能低於GF3 ti200的顯示卡
唉....等更有公信力的測試報告出來再觀望觀望

話說回來，不知道當時外傳的一萬多分是怎麼測出來的
看來是不攻自破...:rolleyes:

P4 2Ghz w/ 512 Megs Ram這樣會不夠力???!!!
這已算是主流的高階系統了

不過一切還是以零售版為主

好像只有ti200的分數

那怎麼跟NV30拼?

16x FAA不是FSAA喔!!
好像是利用類似Photoshop裡面尋找邊緣的功能
把高反差的部分找出來,然後只對此部分做AA
所以佔用的記憶體頻寬不大
要不然真的來個16X FSAA,就算256bit記憶體通道的顯示卡都會跑不動

雖然是很聰明的做法,可以節省巨量記憶體頻寬
但此種FAA對於Doom3那種陰影效果不能產生作用

還有quake3的成績未免低的太誇張了
matrox還是無法把OpenGL搞定嗎?

雖不知這篇可信度如何..但它卻讓我想起前陣子
站上的某篇文章......似乎有人說對了:rolleyes:
anyway..還是等更多的測試報告再下定論吧

沒想到我所說的吹牛預言居然成真......。QQ