蟾蜍宇宙都是這樣的, 你要習慣

最好機器被拆時,都還是通電的狀態 , 我不知道有沒有人會在電腦通電的狀態下直接插拔
CPU/DRAM/HDD等等零件 , 說不定有個天兵直接換power PSU !! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

一樣的道理,DUV/EUV 光刻機 要去做逆向工程 , 有人會在通電狀況下直接去拆內部元件 ?????????
也許這種事老共那裡的天兵會去幹這種事 , 說不定正在運作中的雷射光, 老共的人還拿眼睛
去看雷射光.... :stupefy: :stupefy: :stupefy: :stupefy: :stupefy:

好險大陸人都是這種智障低能兒
放心了
放心了 :p

蔣尚義買來的DUV光刻機一直扣在銀行？
如果真有DUV出這種鳥事，也許就是傳説中的這臺。

蔣爸也被騙了 武漢弘芯千億騙局玩完 遣散全部員工

你罵中時是北七和蟾蜍？ :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

藍白仔兇起來真的連自己的黨媒都咬。 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

大陸拆DUV曝光機 卻急向ASML求救！背後內幕曝光
10:172025/10/21 中時新聞網 邱怡萱
https://www.chinatimes.com/realtime...02-260410?chdtv

中國人應該比你還聰明。因為斷開連線只會失去維修保障，原廠不會殺來你公司強制要求檢查你有沒有拆機。

認真說，中國為了拆機把連線斷開，ASML又能怎樣？

新聞中也有提到，因為是被拆機，根據合約並不保修。

看原文比較公正:
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...ineer-bw-102025

AI:*The National Interest (nationalinterest.org) is a U.S.-based publication focused on international affairs, foreign policy, and national security. Here's a breakdown of its credibility and sponsorship:
📰 Credibility
• Editorial Stance: The National Interest is known for its realist approach to foreign policy, often emphasizing national interest and strategic restraint over ideological interventionism.
• Reputation: It is generally considered a serious publication within policy and academic circles, though its editorial slant leans toward conservative realism. It has featured contributions from prominent scholars, diplomats, and policymakers.
• Fact-Checking: According to Biasly, a media bias and reliability rating platform, its source analysis score is rated as “Fair,” meaning some articles are well-sourced, but readers should critically evaluate the content.
🏛️ Sponsorship & Ownership
• Publisher: The site is published by the Center for the National Interest, a non-partisan, non-profit think tank based in Washington, D.C.
• Founding: The Center was originally established in 1994 by former U.S. President Richard Nixon as part of the Nixon Center, and became independent in 2011.
• Funding: As a think tank, it is funded through a mix of private donations, foundation grants, and possibly corporate sponsors, though specific donor lists are not always publicly disclosed.

怎麼翻人名會用「雪特」這兩個字。
:laugh:

不覺得你自己很可憐嗎？

因為習慣了國內綠媒為了幫綠黨洗地而扭曲事實捏造假新聞，就以為全世界的媒體都是這般無恥。看到中時真實報導新聞反而覺得
異常，無法置信。

長期被扭曲的價值觀要修正回來真的很難啊。

不要妨礙洗地工的工作 :nonono: