跟當兵一樣~~~一堆規定都是要整人的時候才拿出來~~~出事就說是疏懶

以民眾利益為先等於什麼事都不能幹
在辦公室等月底領薪水就好

魚與熊掌不得兼得 你的利益百分百犧牲掉別人的利益
就政府的立場而言 要進步只能犧牲小部分的人 造福大多數人
被犧牲的甘不甘願就不知道了

要是用的是槍械，這個大規模傷亡代表的恐怕會是十倍以上的傷亡人數，
以及更高的受害者死亡比例 :stupefy:

No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.



That government is best which governs least.

----------

最近Thomas Jefferson的名言真好用！ :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

學運=暴民=違反集會遊行法
白狼=路過

我一直覺得台灣應該學習瑞士的民兵制,
進入部隊受訓後,槍跟個人裝備就一起帶回家,
定期教召也是從家裡帶槍去教召,直到除役才交回給國家.

聽你在瞎掰 :unbelief: :unbelief: :unbelief:

Thomas Jefferson要是地下有知，得知合法槍枝被用來射殺無辜學童，
不知作何感想 :stupefy:

Photos of Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre victims sits at a small
memorial near the school on Jan. 14, 2013 in Newtown, Connecticut

不然你怎麼解釋你為何要去抗議
不就你認為你的權益被政府拿法律犧牲掉 :unbelief:

拿這篇來說好了

人民自身利益 vs 聯邦法

你支持誰:unbelief:

A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government.

by George Washington

要舉極端例子也行呀！



e04，阿不就看個韓劇！ :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: