剛剛去看了一下測試評比,果然Geforce 3 的AWadvs-04 應該能破百
為什麼我的這麼低啊?...>_<...MSI Geforce 3Ti200 才60幾分...
剛剛去下載了雷管29.80...測試後還是差不多...唉~我的MAYA~

AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 93.08

DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.47

DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 36.85

Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 7.739


MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 30.88

ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 52.15

amd1800xp技嘉8500

8500的open gl那麼強ㄚ
比我的GloriaIII

該不會有內建神奇跳線變成Fire GL4:D

昨天下戴的
今天早上測試的
8500難道沒辦法跑這個東西嗎
小弟卡也沒有改就這樣測試跑出來就這樣
不過剛剛以經把這塊卡賣掉了4500賣給台北的網友

Cpu:Athlon 1300
Motherboard:技嘉 Via 133a
Vga:技喜Gf2 pro （Soft Quadro）23.11
OS:Windows 2000 sp2

Viewperf 6.1.2
---------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 111.2

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 19.23

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 28.63

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 8.084

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 32.98

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 41.99

但很奇怪的是我裝Viewperf 7.0時會出現Selecting a pixel formal failed 不知是否有人有類似問題

KR7A-raid
1900+
耕宇 200T→DCC 250-550
win2000sp2
nvidia 2980
6.12

---------- SUM_RESULTS\AWADVS\SUMMARY.TXT
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 69.91

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 22.52

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 34.65

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 10.74

---------- SUM_RESULTS\MEDMCAD\SUMMARY.TXT
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 34.90

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROCDRS\SUMMARY.TXT
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 18.16



7.0
Run All Summary

---------- SUM_RESULTS\3DSMAX\SUMMARY.TXT
3dsmax-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 5.485

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DRV\SUMMARY.TXT
drv-08 Weighted Geometric Mean = 31.04

---------- SUM_RESULTS\DX\SUMMARY.TXT
dx-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 34.65

---------- SUM_RESULTS\LIGHT\SUMMARY.TXT
light-05 Weighted Geometric Mean = 12.55

---------- SUM_RESULTS\PROE\SUMMARY.TXT
proe-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 7.621

---------- SUM_RESULTS\UGS\SUMMARY.TXT
ugs-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 3.927

微星GF3 TI200 64ddr(oc220/500)
P3-733
sdram256
xp
AWadvs-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 49.69
DRV-07 Weighted Geometric Mean = 10.78
DX-06 Weighted Geometric Mean = 15.29
Light-04 Weighted Geometric Mean = 3.975
MedMCAD-01 Weighted Geometric Mean = 17.72
ProCDRS-03 Weighted Geometric Mean = 16.68

有奌低

耕宇鈦極220T AWadvs-04 可以到243
不知道真的還是假的 http://www.3dspeed.org/GW220T.htm

我也有看過3D加速網的測試,不過你上面的pikaduke 兄他的220T
AWadvs-04 分數是69.91 ...怎麼會跟3D加速網的測試報告差這麼多
我們班有好幾塊改過跳腳的220T,改天叫他們測測看:confused:

應網友所託
又再加測了一次6.12版...

測試平台:
1.Gigabyte GA-8IHXP Ver2.1(Bios:F3)
2.Intel Pentium4 2.53G ES
3.KingSton PC1066 RDRAM 128MBx4
4.Suma Platinum GeForce4 Ti4200SE 128MB (nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200)
5.Seagate Barracuda ATAIV 40GB 7200rpm (NTFS5)
6.Pioneer DVD-106S
7.Delta 350W PSU
8.Swiftech MCX-462 w/ Delta FFB0812EHE Fan
9.Microsoft Windows XP Professional
10.Intel INF Update Utility 4.00.1013
11.Intel Application Accelerator 2.2
12.nVidia Detonator XP 29.42

測試結果:
SPEC Viewperf 7.0 Suite
此時的顯卡時脈設定為GPU:320MHz / MEM:740MHz
處理器為150x19=2.85GHz
測試平台:
1.Gigabyte GA-8IHXP Ver2.1(Bios:F3)
2.Intel Pentium4 2.53G ES
3.KingSton PC1066 RDRAM 128MBx4
4.Suma Platinum GeForce4 Ti4200SE 128MB (nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200)
5.Seagate Barracuda ATAIV 40GB 7200rpm (NTFS5)
6.Pioneer DVD-106S
7.Delta 350W PSU
8.Swiftech MCX-462 w/ Delta FFB0812EHE Fan
9.Microsoft Windows XP Professional
10.Intel INF Update Utility 4.00.1013
11.Intel Application Accelerator 2.2
12.nVidia Detonator XP 29.42

測試結果:
SPEC Viewperf 7.0 Suite
此時的顯卡時脈設定為GPU:320MHz / MEM:740MHz
處理器為150x19=2.85GHz


SPEC Viewperf 6.12 Suite
設定, 環境同上